|
[meta-oe] [meta-java] openjdk-14 do_configure failed
#error
#oe
Hello guys, I have a core-image-base for a beaglebone black compiled and running, I am very happy with the yocto framework I am trying to get flying in our project. On top of my current image I am try
Hello guys, I have a core-image-base for a beaglebone black compiled and running, I am very happy with the yocto framework I am trying to get flying in our project. On top of my current image I am try
|
By
Konstantin Kletschke
· #90168
·
|
|
[meta-openwrt] Fix various build failures with Zeus
#error
Thanks I have merged these into master
Thanks I have merged these into master
|
By
Khem Raj
· #85853
·
|
|
[meta-openwrt] Fix various build failures with Zeus
#error
There were several build errors in the meta-openwrt layer that Khem maintains against Zeus OE/poky. These are the patches I used to get it building. If they are helpful to Khem/community please feel f
There were several build errors in the meta-openwrt layer that Khem maintains against Zeus OE/poky. These are the patches I used to get it building. If they are helpful to Khem/community please feel f
|
By
Matthew Stanger
· #85821
·
Edited
|
|
angstrom-2008.1, uclibc, perl 5.8.8: error: #error It appears you have defined _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
#error
Dear Henning, Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2010, 17:44 +0200 schrieb Henning Heinold: thank you for your reply. Koen committed your proposed workaround in b62ea92436361e3f89eb433389a2fd48f967e4f0 [1]. Thank
Dear Henning, Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2010, 17:44 +0200 schrieb Henning Heinold: thank you for your reply. Koen committed your proposed workaround in b62ea92436361e3f89eb433389a2fd48f967e4f0 [1]. Thank
|
By
Paul Menzel
· #21009
·
|
|
angstrom-2008.1, uclibc, perl 5.8.8: error: #error It appears you have defined _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
#error
from http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/tree/HEAD:/package/perl perl-5.8.8-020-largefile.patch but you might need fixing up the config.sh nevertheless: http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/blob/HEAD:/pack
from http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/tree/HEAD:/package/perl perl-5.8.8-020-largefile.patch but you might need fixing up the config.sh nevertheless: http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/blob/HEAD:/pack
|
By
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
· #20936
·
|
|
angstrom-2008.1, uclibc, perl 5.8.8: error: #error It appears you have defined _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
#error
Hi, Khem and blindvt introduced a new DISTRO feature largefile which now enables stat64 ander serval other largefile options. Unfornatly for now only minimal-uclibc-distro is using it. A quick workaro
Hi, Khem and blindvt introduced a new DISTRO feature largefile which now enables stat64 ander serval other largefile options. Unfornatly for now only minimal-uclibc-distro is using it. A quick workaro
|
By
...
· #20935
·
|
|
angstrom-2008.1, uclibc, perl 5.8.8: error: #error It appears you have defined _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
#error
Dear OE folks, I tried to build angstrom-2008.1 with the OE dev branch using uclibc. DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES = "en_US.UTF-8 en_GB.UTF-8 de_DE.UTF-8" MACHINE = "beagleboard" B
Dear OE folks, I tried to build angstrom-2008.1 with the OE dev branch using uclibc. DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES = "en_US.UTF-8 en_GB.UTF-8 de_DE.UTF-8" MACHINE = "beagleboard" B
|
By
Paul Menzel
· #20931
·
|
|
error: #error "TLS support is required." while building glibc-initial-2.4 on x86_64
#error
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: [...] > > I've added make 3.81 to OE (by copying all the 3.80 releated make > > files to 3.81 versions - no changes necessary) and then do a
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: [...] > > I've added make 3.81 to OE (by copying all the 3.80 releated make > > files to 3.81 versions - no changes necessary) and then do a
|
By
Jamie Lenehan
· #249
·
|
|
error: #error "TLS support is required." while building glibc-initial-2.4 on x86_64
#error
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jamie Lenehan schreef: Are there any nasty side-effects of update to 3.81? If not, could you commit it? regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Versio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jamie Lenehan schreef: Are there any nasty side-effects of update to 3.81? If not, could you commit it? regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Versio
|
By
...
· #238
·
|
|
error: #error "TLS support is required." while building glibc-initial-2.4 on x86_64
#error
You need to use make 3.81 to build glibc 2.4 for x86 targets on x86_64. I've added make 3.81 to OE (by copying all the 3.80 releated make files to 3.81 versions - no changes necessary) and then do a "
You need to use make 3.81 to build glibc 2.4 for x86 targets on x86_64. I've added make 3.81 to OE (by copying all the 3.80 releated make files to 3.81 versions - no changes necessary) and then do a "
|
By
Jamie Lenehan
· #235
·
|
|
error: #error "TLS support is required." while building glibc-initial-2.4 on x86_64
#error
I tried to start a fully renewed oe build system today with bitbake 1.6 and up to date oe checkout. I am using minimal distro/machine files. While building bootstrap-image/glibc-initial-2.4 on an x86_
I tried to start a fully renewed oe build system today with bitbake 1.6 and up to date oe checkout. I am using minimal distro/machine files. While building bootstrap-image/glibc-initial-2.4 on an x86_
|
By
...
· #195
·
|