|
Xorg-7.5 from branch martin_jansa/xorg-7.5
Hi, please review patches living in martin_jansa/xorg-7.5 Its used in shr distribution for openmoko devices and I've tested it on Sharp Zaurus (C3000-spitz). I'm not sure if you can also use mesa-dri
Hi, please review patches living in martin_jansa/xorg-7.5 Its used in shr distribution for openmoko devices and I've tested it on Sharp Zaurus (C3000-spitz). I'm not sure if you can also use mesa-dri
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14139
·
|
|
[PATCH] bitbake.conf: SRCPV always upgradeable paths for git recipes
RP said you did on #oe 16:25:45 < RP> JaMa|Wrk: I can't sanction that, needs to be proposed on list but I'd ack it 16:26:18 < XorA> JaMa|Wrk: got my Ack 16:26:46 < RP> It was mentioned informally at O
RP said you did on #oe 16:25:45 < RP> JaMa|Wrk: I can't sanction that, needs to be proposed on list but I'd ack it 16:26:18 < XorA> JaMa|Wrk: got my Ack 16:26:46 < RP> It was mentioned informally at O
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14153
·
|
|
OEDEM 2009 summary: Package management
Today I've "fixed" one problem we had with opkg in shr. opkg installs own version of update-alternatives its the same script as the one packaged as update-alternatives-cworth its installed to /usr/bin
Today I've "fixed" one problem we had with opkg in shr. opkg installs own version of update-alternatives its the same script as the one packaged as update-alternatives-cworth its installed to /usr/bin
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14162
·
|
|
[PATCH] bitbake.conf: SRCPV always upgradeable paths for git recipes
Thanks pushed. What about SRCREV->SRCPV migration? 1) svn recipes with +svnr{SRCREV} could be just replaced with +svnr{SRCPV} as the output should be the same 2) svn recipes with -r{SRCREV}, -svn{SRCR
Thanks pushed. What about SRCREV->SRCPV migration? 1) svn recipes with +svnr{SRCREV} could be just replaced with +svnr{SRCPV} as the output should be the same 2) svn recipes with -r{SRCREV}, -svn{SRCR
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14193
·
|
|
OEDEM 2009 summary: Package management
with update-alternatives removed from opkg-native I noticed that virtual/update-alternatives-native defined in sane-feed-ipk.inc is not installed at all before building any image, so created image is
with update-alternatives removed from opkg-native I noticed that virtual/update-alternatives-native defined in sane-feed-ipk.inc is not installed at all before building any image, so created image is
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14269
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
As I sent earlier as reply to [PATCH] bitbake.conf: SRCPV always upgradeable paths for git recipes. First few changes are already in martin_jansa/srcpv branch. All changes to svn.bb recipes seems safe
As I sent earlier as reply to [PATCH] bitbake.conf: SRCPV always upgradeable paths for git recipes. First few changes are already in martin_jansa/srcpv branch. All changes to svn.bb recipes seems safe
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14307
·
|
|
New parse error in dev
Sorry for that.. fixed with 29d6bcd8585aff0833eb88c06c3cc2474675c25c Just removed that inherit, libmodulo was only user of girepository class so we'll add it to libmodulo recipe directly if still need
Sorry for that.. fixed with 29d6bcd8585aff0833eb88c06c3cc2474675c25c Just removed that inherit, libmodulo was only user of girepository class so we'll add it to libmodulo recipe directly if still need
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14312
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Almost all changes for SRCPV (no SRCREV in my tree now, just few recipes named *git.bb doesn't have SRCPV in PV yet..) are in martin_jansa/srcpv branch please review them or even cherry-pick some if y
Almost all changes for SRCPV (no SRCREV in my tree now, just few recipes named *git.bb doesn't have SRCPV in PV yet..) are in martin_jansa/srcpv branch please review them or even cherry-pick some if y
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14314
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Hi, I'm not sure if this is 100% right but it behaves like this here: with AUTOREV used as SRCREV you get ${SRCREV} in format gitrNNNN+hash where NNNN is localcount incremented on buildhost every time
Hi, I'm not sure if this is 100% right but it behaves like this here: with AUTOREV used as SRCREV you get ${SRCREV} in format gitrNNNN+hash where NNNN is localcount incremented on buildhost every time
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14345
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Sure, but AUTOREV is still usefull for recipes which are ie distro specific (ie shr telephony stack) which is still developing pretty fast and no one would like to see SRCREV bumps twice a day just be
Sure, but AUTOREV is still usefull for recipes which are ie distro specific (ie shr telephony stack) which is still developing pretty fast and no one would like to see SRCREV bumps twice a day just be
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14350
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
This could be enough? Just putting BB_GIT_LOCALCOUNT_FOR_SRCREV = "0" somewhere (local.conf/distro.conf) and _count will always stay on 0 (gitr0+abc1234def)
This could be enough? Just putting BB_GIT_LOCALCOUNT_FOR_SRCREV = "0" somewhere (local.conf/distro.conf) and _count will always stay on 0 (gitr0+abc1234def)
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14356
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
OK better version with this you can add LOCALCOUNT_pn-bar ?= "4" to ie sane-srcrevs.inc or LOCALCOUNT ?= "4" to recipes/foo/bar_git.bb (btw seems like LOCALCOUNT_pn-bar has higher preferrence even if
OK better version with this you can add LOCALCOUNT_pn-bar ?= "4" to ie sane-srcrevs.inc or LOCALCOUNT ?= "4" to recipes/foo/bar_git.bb (btw seems like LOCALCOUNT_pn-bar has higher preferrence even if
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14371
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
OK pushed first 4 patches, svn recipes should be converted now..
OK pushed first 4 patches, svn recipes should be converted now..
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14374
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Updated patch, thanks RP!
Updated patch, thanks RP!
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14379
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Hopefully resolved with this bitbake patch
Hopefully resolved with this bitbake patch
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14387
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Sorry previous patch used localcount even for svn recipes, that was wrong. This version should be ok.
Sorry previous patch used localcount even for svn recipes, that was wrong. This version should be ok.
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14393
·
|
|
SRCPV migration
Hopefully last time? :)
By
Martin Jansa
· #14394
·
|
|
[PATCH 06/51] opkg: don't install update-alternatives script
* it is copy of update-alternatives-cworth * it's not what distribution specifies with virtual/update-alternatives(-native) * make sure that update-alternatives-native is available for image creation
* it is copy of update-alternatives-cworth * it's not what distribution specifies with virtual/update-alternatives(-native) * make sure that update-alternatives-native is available for image creation
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14426
·
|
|
[PATCH 07/51] update-alternatives-cworth: use latest installed alternative
* if there is more alternatives with higest priority, use the one last in alternatives file (latest installed) * if target exists and its directory, remove link, otherwise new alternative link is crea
* if there is more alternatives with higest priority, use the one last in alternatives file (latest installed) * if target exists and its directory, remove link, otherwise new alternative link is crea
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14427
·
|
|
[PATCH] bitbake.conf: Fix OVERRIDES description (After pb's explanation)
--- conf/bitbake.conf | 11 ++++++++--- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/bitbake.conf b/conf/bitbake.conf index 4435fdd..2f7cef2 100644 --- a/conf/bitbake.conf +++ b/c
--- conf/bitbake.conf | 11 ++++++++--- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/bitbake.conf b/conf/bitbake.conf index 4435fdd..2f7cef2 100644 --- a/conf/bitbake.conf +++ b/c
|
By
Martin Jansa
· #14473
·
|