|
[PATCH] Add dhcp 3.1.2p1 and fix unneeded bash dependency in 3.0.*
Hi,
The latest stable of the isc dhcp 3.x source is 3.1.2p1. I realize that
there are already 4.x releases out too, but I have not tested any of
them yet.
In any case: the dhclient/scripts/linux is
Hi,
The latest stable of the isc dhcp 3.x source is 3.1.2p1. I realize that
there are already 4.x releases out too, but I have not tested any of
them yet.
In any case: the dhclient/scripts/linux is
|
By
Marc Olzheim <zlo@...>
·
#13844
·
|
|
[STABLE][PATCH 3/3] omap3517-evm: omap3517 was the pre-production name, AM3517 is the production name, rename machine to avoid confusion
From: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
---
conf/machine/am3517-evm.conf | 52 +
conf/machine/omap3517-evm.conf | 50 -
From: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
---
conf/machine/am3517-evm.conf | 52 +
conf/machine/omap3517-evm.conf | 50 -
|
By
Koen Kooi
·
#13843
·
|
|
[STABLE][PATCH 2/3] xserver-xorg-conf: add omap3517-evm support
From: Koen Kooi <koen@...>
* This fixes the "blank screen" problem Frank Walzer reported
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
---
.../xserver-xorg-conf/omap3517-evm/xorg.conf
From: Koen Kooi <koen@...>
* This fixes the "blank screen" problem Frank Walzer reported
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
---
.../xserver-xorg-conf/omap3517-evm/xorg.conf
|
By
Koen Kooi
·
#13842
·
|
|
[STABLE][PATCH 1/3] clutter.inc: rework armv7a machines a bit and add omap3517-evm to compatible machines
From: Koen Kooi <koen@...>
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
---
recipes/clutter/clutter.inc | 18 +++++-------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff
From: Koen Kooi <koen@...>
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@...>
---
recipes/clutter/clutter.inc | 18 +++++-------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff
|
By
Koen Kooi
·
#13841
·
|
|
Re: Staging - time to end the current mess - now with patches
Richard Purdie wrote:
I agree with the new concept. I did not understand, why we need
do_stage, if we can mangle and stage DESTDIR directly.
Maybe do_mangle and do_mangle_append or so may look
Richard Purdie wrote:
I agree with the new concept. I did not understand, why we need
do_stage, if we can mangle and stage DESTDIR directly.
Maybe do_mangle and do_mangle_append or so may look
|
By
Stanislav Brabec <utx@...>
·
#13840
·
|
|
Re: Problems building binutils-cross_2.18.50.0.7.bb
Before someone says "it's a wiki, fix it!" I must point that this it's a wiki and people have already unfixed it multiple times. The amount of unfixing is just too vast, which is why the official
Before someone says "it's a wiki, fix it!" I must point that this it's a wiki and people have already unfixed it multiple times. The amount of unfixing is just too vast, which is why the official
|
By
Koen Kooi
·
#13839
·
|
|
Re: Problems building binutils-cross_2.18.50.0.7.bb
If you're going to build for beagleboard, don't use that guide, but use http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
regards,
Koen
If you're going to build for beagleboard, don't use that guide, but use http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
regards,
Koen
|
By
Koen Kooi
·
#13838
·
|
|
Problems building binutils-cross_2.18.50.0.7.bb
Hi OE list members!
It's my first message on this list, and it's related to the problems I
have building
OE for my beagleboard. My host machine is a mandriva 2008.0.
I'm following the steps from
Hi OE list members!
It's my first message on this list, and it's related to the problems I
have building
OE for my beagleboard. My host machine is a mandriva 2008.0.
I'm following the steps from
|
By
jorge fernandez monteagudo <jorgefm@...>
·
#13837
·
|
|
Re: trying to get newest bitbake package into fedora
or (forgive me for not pointing this out in the earlier post),
anyone can get the source rpm
or (forgive me for not pointing this out in the earlier post),
anyone can get the source rpm
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#13836
·
|
|
Re: trying to get newest bitbake package into fedora
with fedora, it's easier than rummaging around, looking for
corresponding srpms. if a binary package exists, then getting the
corresponding source package usually involves just:
$ yumdownloader
with fedora, it's easier than rummaging around, looking for
corresponding srpms. if a binary package exists, then getting the
corresponding source package usually involves just:
$ yumdownloader
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#13835
·
|
|
Re: trying to get newest bitbake package into fedora
During the release I screwed up and introduced a typo that was serious
enough to kill the .14 release :(.
Cheers,
Richard
During the release I screwed up and introduced a typo that was serious
enough to kill the .14 release :(.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#13834
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] User Manual, correct "task-native-sdk" to "task-sdk-native"
Dnia środa, 4 listopada 2009 o 10:21:50 Robert P. J. Day napisał(a):
I did not noticed that name was changed...
Regards,
--
JID: hrw@...
Website:
Dnia środa, 4 listopada 2009 o 10:21:50 Robert P. J. Day napisał(a):
I did not noticed that name was changed...
Regards,
--
JID: hrw@...
Website:
|
By
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin@...>
·
#13833
·
|
|
[PATCH] User Manual, correct "task-native-sdk" to "task-sdk-native"
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...>
---
sorry, i missed this for the previous patch. i'm assuming the
author really wanted to refer to "task-sdk-native", yes?
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...>
---
sorry, i missed this for the previous patch. i'm assuming the
author really wanted to refer to "task-sdk-native", yes?
diff --git
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#13832
·
|
|
[PATCH] User Manual: Warn readers about mmap and SELinux issue.
On some Linux distros, if you set the kernel /proc file
/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr to zero, you will probably get an SELinux
violation if you're running SELinux in enforcing mode. Explain to
On some Linux distros, if you set the kernel /proc file
/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr to zero, you will probably get an SELinux
violation if you're running SELinux in enforcing mode. Explain to
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#13831
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] eglibc: updated armv4t-interworking.patch
http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?h=shr/merge&id=b7c9855c7ece03a0876c0d50922f908b65c5f095
should be also cherry-picked to replace another __ARM_ARCH_V4T__
with
http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?h=shr/merge&id=b7c9855c7ece03a0876c0d50922f908b65c5f095
should be also cherry-picked to replace another __ARM_ARCH_V4T__
with
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#13830
·
|
|
[PATCH] eglibc: updated armv4t-interworking.patch
From: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@...>
* Updated patch to make SYSCALL_ERROR_HANDLER interworking safe.
* Phil Blundell found and fixed another issue in eglibc armv4t builds.
Signed-off-by:
From: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@...>
* Updated patch to make SYSCALL_ERROR_HANDLER interworking safe.
* Phil Blundell found and fixed another issue in eglibc armv4t builds.
Signed-off-by:
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#13829
·
|
|
[PATCH] User manual typoes and aesthetics, chapter 2 only.
Some minor cleanups for Chapter 2 of the User Manual:
* add some DocBook tags for filenames
* update BitBake version to 1.8.16
* add missing space after "wget" command
* correct misspelled
Some minor cleanups for Chapter 2 of the User Manual:
* add some DocBook tags for filenames
* update BitBake version to 1.8.16
* add missing space after "wget" command
* correct misspelled
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#13828
·
|
|
[patch] ti-cs1-omap3530 upgrade
Is possible upgrade cs1-omap3530?
thank you
Andrea Seraghiti
diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-cs1-omap3530_1.0.1.bb
b/recipes/ti/ti-cs1-omap3530_1.0.1.bb
index 9779c33..039aa92 100644
---
Is possible upgrade cs1-omap3530?
thank you
Andrea Seraghiti
diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-cs1-omap3530_1.0.1.bb
b/recipes/ti/ti-cs1-omap3530_1.0.1.bb
index 9779c33..039aa92 100644
---
|
By
Andrea <serra82@...>
·
#13827
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] Aesthetic fix in chapter 1.
Acked-by: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <zecke@...>
Acked-by: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <zecke@...>
|
By
Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger+oe@...>
·
#13825
·
|
|
Re: trying to get newest bitbake package into fedora
i could probably repackage it, i just wasn't sure if someone at OE
monitored packaging requests like that or was notified by fedora when
requests like that came in. and i might as well update that
i could probably repackage it, i just wasn't sure if someone at OE
monitored packaging requests like that or was notified by fedora when
requests like that came in. and i might as well update that
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#13826
·
|