|
[master][kirkstone][PATCH v3] rootfs-postcommands: fix symlinks where link and output path are equal
When creating the manifest and the testdata.json links, if the link
name is equal to the output name the link is not created, otherwise
it is. This prevents a link-to-self in the first
When creating the manifest and the testdata.json links, if the link
name is equal to the output name the link is not created, otherwise
it is. This prevents a link-to-self in the first
|
By
Davide Gardenal
·
#165215
·
|
|
[PATCH] abi_version/sstate: Bump hashequiv and sstate versions due to git changes
The autobuilder sstate was corrupted via incorrect equiavlences caused by
the security fix to git and the poor interaction that had with SCM version
checks under fakeroot/pseudo. Bump the versions to
The autobuilder sstate was corrupted via incorrect equiavlences caused by
the security fix to git and the poor interaction that had with SCM version
checks under fakeroot/pseudo. Bump the versions to
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#165214
·
|
|
Re: [master][kirkstone][PATCH v2] rootfs-postcommands: fix symlinks where link and output path are equal
Hi Davide,
"Davide Gardenal" <davidegarde2000@...> ha scritto:
A missing ':' here causes parsing
Hi Davide,
"Davide Gardenal" <davidegarde2000@...> ha scritto:
A missing ':' here causes parsing
|
By
Luca Ceresoli
·
#165213
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] networkd-dispatcher: Update to 2.2.1 to fix CVE-2022-29799 and CVE-2022-29800
Hi Colin,
"Colin Finck" <c.finck@...> ha scritto:
Thank you for your patch, but meta-networking is not part of oe-core.
It's part of meta-oe, so you should send it to the appropriate
Hi Colin,
"Colin Finck" <c.finck@...> ha scritto:
Thank you for your patch, but meta-networking is not part of oe-core.
It's part of meta-oe, so you should send it to the appropriate
|
By
Luca Ceresoli
·
#165212
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 00/15] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request
hey Bruce,
Since this patch, qemuarmv5 fails to build with:
00:01:47 NOTE: Running task 899 of 5734
hey Bruce,
Since this patch, qemuarmv5 fails to build with:
00:01:47 NOTE: Running task 899 of 5734
|
By
Nicolas Dechesne
·
#165211
·
|
|
Re: [kirkstone 00/34] Pull request (cover letter only)
Thanks Steve
By
Khem Raj
·
#165210
·
|
|
Re: [kirkstone 00/34] Pull request (cover letter only)
Yes, I've already got that in my patch set currently under test:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/kirkstone-nut
Steve
Yes, I've already got that in my patch set currently under test:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/kirkstone-nut
Steve
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#165209
·
|
|
Re: [kirkstone 00/34] Pull request (cover letter only)
can you pick
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=20e9917b8d40f576b3661bc29e13602a24e86b7b
too plz
can you pick
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=20e9917b8d40f576b3661bc29e13602a24e86b7b
too plz
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#165208
·
|
|
[kirkstone 00/34] Pull request (cover letter only)
The following changes since commit ca1c990df62f1b3d53b2114a387f192efe7e38e8:
ruby: upgrade 3.1.1 -> 3.1.2 (2022-04-28 17:07:01 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
The following changes since commit ca1c990df62f1b3d53b2114a387f192efe7e38e8:
ruby: upgrade 3.1.1 -> 3.1.2 (2022-04-28 17:07:01 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#165207
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/2] vim: Security Fix For CVE-2022-1381
The security issues with vim have proven to be rather annoying and we've simply
been updating the recipe to the latest version more recently to handle these.
Would you fancy sending a version update
The security issues with vim have proven to be rather annoying and we've simply
been updating the recipe to the latest version more recently to handle these.
Would you fancy sending a version update
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#165206
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] rng-tools: disable libjitterentropy due to cpu usage
I wonder if rng-tools is still needed after 5.6+ kernel after this commit [1]
Arch Linux wiki says no [2]. We added this as a recommendation to
openssh by default [3] [4],
I wonder if we can turn that
I wonder if rng-tools is still needed after 5.6+ kernel after this commit [1]
Arch Linux wiki says no [2]. We added this as a recommendation to
openssh by default [3] [4],
I wonder if we can turn that
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#165205
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] rng-tools: disable libjitterentropy due to cpu usage
Perhaps what's needed then is a 'hwrng' in MACHINE_FEATURES?
rng-tools enables jitter by default if it's built in, even if hwrng is
available. Maybe it's faster to do this on more powerful machines
Perhaps what's needed then is a 'hwrng' in MACHINE_FEATURES?
rng-tools enables jitter by default if it's built in, even if hwrng is
available. Maybe it's faster to do this on more powerful machines
|
By
Wes Malone <wes@...>
·
#165204
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW18`22
Current Dev Position: YP 4.1 M1
Next Deadline: 30th May 2022 YP 4.1 M1 Build
Next Team Meetings:
Yocto Project Summit - 17th-19th May (https://www.yoctoproject.org/yocto-project-summit-2022-05/)
Bug
Current Dev Position: YP 4.1 M1
Next Deadline: 30th May 2022 YP 4.1 M1 Build
Next Team Meetings:
Yocto Project Summit - 17th-19th May (https://www.yoctoproject.org/yocto-project-summit-2022-05/)
Bug
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#165203
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell 3/9] devshell.bbclass: Allow devshell & pydevshell to use the network
<peter.kjellerstedt@...> wrote:
Thanks so much for the review Peter!
Clearly I haven't yet perfected my mode switching between kirkstone
and dunfell :-(
Steve
<peter.kjellerstedt@...> wrote:
Thanks so much for the review Peter!
Clearly I haven't yet perfected my mode switching between kirkstone
and dunfell :-(
Steve
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#165202
·
|
|
[PATCH] networkd-dispatcher: Update to 2.2.1 to fix CVE-2022-29799 and CVE-2022-29800
Signed-off-by: Colin Finck <c.finck@...>
---
...{networkd-dispatcher_2.1.bb => networkd-dispatcher_2.2.1.bb} | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename
Signed-off-by: Colin Finck <c.finck@...>
---
...{networkd-dispatcher_2.1.bb => networkd-dispatcher_2.2.1.bb} | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename
|
By
Colin Finck
·
#165201
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#165200
·
|
|
[master][kirkstone][PATCH v2] rootfs-postcommands: fix symlinks where link and output path are equal
When creating the manifest and the testdata.json links, if the link
name is equal to the output name the link is not created, otherwise
it is. This prevents a link-to-self in the first
When creating the manifest and the testdata.json links, if the link
name is equal to the output name the link is not created, otherwise
it is. This prevents a link-to-self in the first
|
By
Davide Gardenal
·
#165199
·
|
|
Re: [master][kirkstone][PATCH] rootfs-postcommands: fix symlinks where link and output path are equal
Yes, I don’t know how this happened...
Yes, I don’t know how this happened...
|
By
Davide Gardenal
·
#165198
·
|
|
Re: [master][kirkstone][PATCH] rootfs-postcommands: fix symlinks where link and output path are equal
Hi Davide,
"Davide Gardenal" <davidegarde2000@...> ha scritto:
This change is mixing tabs and spaces.
And this as well.
Can you send v2 with spaces-only indentation?
Best regards,
--
Luca
Hi Davide,
"Davide Gardenal" <davidegarde2000@...> ha scritto:
This change is mixing tabs and spaces.
And this as well.
Can you send v2 with spaces-only indentation?
Best regards,
--
Luca
|
By
Luca Ceresoli
·
#165197
·
|
|
[PATCH v3] classes: rootfs-postcommands: add skip option to overlayfs_qa_check
The overlayfs_qa_check checks if the current root file system has a
mount configured for each overlayfs, when the overlayfs class is used.
However there are certain instances where this mount point
The overlayfs_qa_check checks if the current root file system has a
mount configured for each overlayfs, when the overlayfs class is used.
However there are certain instances where this mount point
|
By
Claudius Heine
·
#165196
·
|