|
OE-core CVE metrics for kirkstone on Sun 26 Mar 2023 03:00:01 AM HST
Branch: kirkstone
New this week: 1 CVEs
CVE-2023-28531 (CVSS3: 9.8 CRITICAL): openssh https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-28531 *
Removed this week: 16 CVEs
CVE-2022-48281
Branch: kirkstone
New this week: 1 CVEs
CVE-2023-28531 (CVSS3: 9.8 CRITICAL): openssh https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-28531 *
Removed this week: 16 CVEs
CVE-2022-48281
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#179119
·
|
|
OE-core CVE metrics for dunfell on Sun 26 Mar 2023 02:30:01 AM HST
Branch: dunfell
New this week: 4 CVEs
CVE-2022-3515 (CVSS3: 9.8 CRITICAL): gnupg:gnupg-native https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-3515 *
CVE-2023-28486 (CVSS3: 5.3 MEDIUM): sudo
Branch: dunfell
New this week: 4 CVEs
CVE-2022-3515 (CVSS3: 9.8 CRITICAL): gnupg:gnupg-native https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-3515 *
CVE-2023-28486 (CVSS3: 5.3 MEDIUM): sudo
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#179118
·
|
|
OE-core CVE metrics for master on Sun 26 Mar 2023 02:00:01 AM HST
Branch: master
New this week: 1 CVEs
CVE-2023-28531 (CVSS3: 9.8 CRITICAL): openssh https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-28531 *
Removed this week: 0 CVEs
Full list: Found 7
Branch: master
New this week: 1 CVEs
CVE-2023-28531 (CVSS3: 9.8 CRITICAL): openssh https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-28531 *
Removed this week: 0 CVEs
Full list: Found 7
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#179117
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] package: moving field data process before variable process in process_pkgconfig
It is worth noting this fix actually resolved a number of latent bugs
too. This breakage in reproducibility was as a result of this
It is worth noting this fix actually resolved a number of latent bugs
too. This breakage in reproducibility was as a result of this
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#179116
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/7] kernel: consolidated pull request
It only happened with 5.15 for some reason...
Cheers,
Richard
It only happened with 5.15 for some reason...
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#179115
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] python3-scons: upgrade to v4.5.2
Please. There is some issue breaking master-next and I worry it is
something which already made it into master as there are only a limited
set of possibilities in -next including this. I can't quite
Please. There is some issue breaking master-next and I worry it is
something which already made it into master as there are only a limited
set of possibilities in -next including this. I can't quite
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#179114
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] python3-scons: upgrade to v4.5.2
You're right, the commit which fixed the issue:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/commit/a4ab466c6df5bd3187e78c36bfa8f68e1fb7659e
said #4231 so I went with this less cool number (without noticing that my
You're right, the commit which fixed the issue:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/commit/a4ab466c6df5bd3187e78c36bfa8f68e1fb7659e
said #4231 so I went with this less cool number (without noticing that my
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#179113
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] python3-scons: upgrade to v4.5.2
I think that should be 4321!
Cheers,
Richard
I think that should be 4321!
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#179112
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 4/5] devtool: add support for multiple git url inside a cargo based recipe
Ah, good idea, I'll try that and provide a V2 of this series if it fits.
Ah, good idea, I'll try that and provide a V2 of this series if it fits.
|
By
Frederic Martinsons
·
#179111
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 4/5] devtool: add support for multiple git url inside a cargo based recipe
Sorry for making it not clear.
Without this patch, git url that are in the original SRC_URI of the recipe are simply
remove from the final SRC_URI under devtool and so it
Sorry for making it not clear.
Without this patch, git url that are in the original SRC_URI of the recipe are simply
remove from the final SRC_URI under devtool and so it
|
By
Frederic Martinsons
·
#179110
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/7] kernel: consolidated pull request
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
squash away. Looks fine to me.
Strange that I'm still not seeing that here, I tested all of my 6.1
and 6.3 updates with that in place!
Bruce
--
- Thou
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
squash away. Looks fine to me.
Strange that I'm still not seeing that here, I tested all of my 6.1
and 6.3 updates with that in place!
Bruce
--
- Thou
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#179109
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 7/7] webkitgtk: update 2.38.5 -> 2.40.0
Am Sa, 25. Mär 2023 um 19:56:00 +0100 schrieb Markus Volk <f_l_k@...>:
During the change I noticed that webkitgtk-4 (built with gtk3) also stores its libs in ${libdir}/webkit2gtk-4.*. If I now
Am Sa, 25. Mär 2023 um 19:56:00 +0100 schrieb Markus Volk <f_l_k@...>:
During the change I noticed that webkitgtk-4 (built with gtk3) also stores its libs in ${libdir}/webkit2gtk-4.*. If I now
|
By
Markus Volk
·
#179108
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] Remove usage of /var/volatile/tmp
Am Sa, 25. Mär 2023 um 19:38:56 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>:
core-image-minimal () - Ran 71 tests in 38.845s
core-image-minimal - OK - All required tests passed (successes=1,
Am Sa, 25. Mär 2023 um 19:38:56 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>:
core-image-minimal () - Ran 71 tests in 38.845s
core-image-minimal - OK - All required tests passed (successes=1,
|
By
Markus Volk
·
#179107
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 3/5] rust-example: provide a recipe for zvariant
I thought that would be treated the same as rust-hello-world_git.bb which is in oe-core.
Anyway, I don't mind placing it elsewhere, which layer do you think this recipe would land?
I thought that would be treated the same as rust-hello-world_git.bb which is in oe-core.
Anyway, I don't mind placing it elsewhere, which layer do you think this recipe would land?
|
By
Frederic Martinsons
·
#179106
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 4/5] devtool: add support for multiple git url inside a cargo based recipe
<frederic.martinsons@...> wrote:
Come to think of it, it's better to use the same type parameter with a
special value as in kernel recipes:
git://.....;type=cargo-dep;...
This would avoid the
<frederic.martinsons@...> wrote:
Come to think of it, it's better to use the same type parameter with a
special value as in kernel recipes:
git://.....;type=cargo-dep;...
This would avoid the
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#179105
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 7/7] webkitgtk: update 2.38.5 -> 2.40.0
Am Sa, 25. Mär 2023 um 19:35:57 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>:
Will do. I was afraid that webkitgtk-4 is confusing for the gtk3 variant, but named it anyway because meson reports
Am Sa, 25. Mär 2023 um 19:35:57 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>:
Will do. I was afraid that webkitgtk-4 is confusing for the gtk3 variant, but named it anyway because meson reports
|
By
Markus Volk
·
#179104
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 4/5] devtool: add support for multiple git url inside a cargo based recipe
<frederic.martinsons@...> wrote:
What actually happens without this patch, and what does the patch
change? The commit message isn't making it clear.
Adding special cases based on custom
<frederic.martinsons@...> wrote:
What actually happens without this patch, and what does the patch
change? The commit message isn't making it clear.
Adding special cases based on custom
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#179103
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 3/5] rust-example: provide a recipe for zvariant
I don't think this should be going in oe-core, as it's not actually
used by anything, or in any automated tests. But you can place it in a
separate layer.
Alex
<frederic.martinsons@...>
I don't think this should be going in oe-core, as it's not actually
used by anything, or in any automated tests. But you can place it in a
separate layer.
Alex
<frederic.martinsons@...>
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#179102
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] Remove usage of /var/volatile/tmp
Thanks for testing this. mdev-busybox is actually tested only with
poky-tiny distro and core-image-minimal image (where it is used by
default), so if it doesn't regress there, it's fine.
Alex
Thanks for testing this. mdev-busybox is actually tested only with
poky-tiny distro and core-image-minimal image (where it is used by
default), so if it doesn't regress there, it's fine.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#179101
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 7/7] webkitgtk: update 2.38.5 -> 2.40.0
Can you please name the gtk3 variant webkitgtk-3? I don't like
carrying those version suffixes when the older version is going to
have a short phaseout period.
Alex
Can you please name the gtk3 variant webkitgtk-3? I don't like
carrying those version suffixes when the older version is going to
have a short phaseout period.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#179100
·
|