|
Intermittent failure issue summary
I'm guessing a lot of people don't follow the intermittent issues. I therefore
thought I'd share a summary of some of them along with some random thoughts on
them. There is a mix of different things
I'm guessing a lot of people don't follow the intermittent issues. I therefore
thought I'd share a summary of some of them along with some random thoughts on
them. There is a mix of different things
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#164532
·
|
|
Re: License mismatched for libxshmfence_1.3.bb and recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
It would seem reasonable although hardknott is due to have it's final build
soon.
Cheers,
Richard
It would seem reasonable although hardknott is due to have it's final build
soon.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#164531
·
|
|
Re: License mismatched for libxshmfence_1.3.bb and recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
The following supported versions have the same problem, should we also fix them?
Dunfell
Hardknott
Honister
I'd like to send the patches after testing if we need fix them.
// Robert
The following supported versions have the same problem, should we also fix them?
Dunfell
Hardknott
Honister
I'd like to send the patches after testing if we need fix them.
// Robert
|
By
Robert Yang
·
#164530
·
|
|
Re: License mismatched for libxshmfence_1.3.bb and recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
I don't know why it was set to proprietary in the test but it doesn't seem to
cause any regressions so I removed it. It is at an older version which should
mean it doesn't affect other builds so I'm
I don't know why it was set to proprietary in the test but it doesn't seem to
cause any regressions so I removed it. It is at an older version which should
mean it doesn't affect other builds so I'm
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#164529
·
|
|
Re: License mismatched for libxshmfence_1.3.bb and recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
Hi RP,
Thank you very much, I'm trying to run the test cases, but I found that you've already fixed them, thanks again.
// Robert
Hi RP,
Thank you very much, I'm trying to run the test cases, but I found that you've already fixed them, thanks again.
// Robert
|
By
Robert Yang
·
#164528
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] glibc: ptest: Fix glibc-tests package issue
This isn't what I meant. I meant something like:
REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = 'ptest'
inherit features_check
Cheers,
Richard
This isn't what I meant. I meant something like:
REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = 'ptest'
inherit features_check
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#164527
·
|
|
Re: [RFT][PATCH v3] gcc: upgrade 11.2 -> current gcc-12 snapshot
I ran this through the autobuilder as requested as it means we have a chance to
get things fixed upstream before gcc 12 is
I ran this through the autobuilder as requested as it means we have a chance to
get things fixed upstream before gcc 12 is
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#164526
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] glibc: ptest: Fix glibc-tests package issue
Hi Richard,
Thanks very much for mentioning the correct way of fixing the issue.
The modified patch is posted as:-
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164524
Please let me
Hi Richard,
Thanks very much for mentioning the correct way of fixing the issue.
The modified patch is posted as:-
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164524
Please let me
|
By
Pgowda
·
#164525
·
|
|
[PATCH v2] glibc: ptest: Fix glibc-tests package issue
The current default DISTRO_FEATURES does not support ptest.
Hence, the following error is generated during "bitbake glibc-tests".
ERROR: glibc-tests-2.35-r0 do_package: QA Issue:
The current default DISTRO_FEATURES does not support ptest.
Hence, the following error is generated during "bitbake glibc-tests".
ERROR: glibc-tests-2.35-r0 do_package: QA Issue:
|
By
Pgowda
·
#164524
·
|
|
[PATCH] ethtool: upgrade 5.16 -> 5.17
Signed-off-by: Changhyeok Bae <changhyeok.bae@...>
---
.../recipes-extended/ethtool/ethtool/avoid_parallel_tests.patch | 2 +-
.../ethtool/{ethtool_5.16.bb => ethtool_5.17.bb} |
Signed-off-by: Changhyeok Bae <changhyeok.bae@...>
---
.../recipes-extended/ethtool/ethtool/avoid_parallel_tests.patch | 2 +-
.../ethtool/{ethtool_5.16.bb => ethtool_5.17.bb} |
|
By
Changhyeok Bae
·
#164523
·
|
|
[AUH] vte: upgrading to 0.68.0 SUCCEEDED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *vte* to *0.68.0* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *vte* to *0.68.0* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164522
·
|
|
[AUH] Upgrade status: 2022-04-15
Recipe upgrade statistics:
* Failed(do_compile): 12
u-boot-tools, 2022.04, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...>
u-boot, 2022.04, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...>
Recipe upgrade statistics:
* Failed(do_compile): 12
u-boot-tools, 2022.04, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...>
u-boot, 2022.04, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...>
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164521
·
|
|
[AUH] libusb1: upgrading to 1.0.26 SUCCEEDED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libusb1* to *1.0.26* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libusb1* to *1.0.26* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164520
·
|
|
[AUH] lttng-tools: upgrading to 2.13.7 SUCCEEDED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *lttng-tools* to *2.13.7* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *lttng-tools* to *2.13.7* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164519
·
|
|
[AUH] libgcrypt: upgrading to 1.10.1 FAILED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libgcrypt* to *1.10.1* has Failed(do_compile).
Detailed error
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libgcrypt* to *1.10.1* has Failed(do_compile).
Detailed error
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164518
·
|
|
[AUH] shared-mime-info: upgrading to 2.2 SUCCEEDED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *shared-mime-info* to *2.2* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *shared-mime-info* to *2.2* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164517
·
|
|
[AUH] libsoup: upgrading to 3.0.6 SUCCEEDED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libsoup* to *3.0.6* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libsoup* to *3.0.6* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164516
·
|
|
[AUH] libgpg-error: upgrading to 1.45 FAILED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libgpg-error* to *1.45* has Failed (devtool error).
Detailed error
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libgpg-error* to *1.45* has Failed (devtool error).
Detailed error
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164515
·
|
|
[AUH] libgit2: upgrading to 1.4.3 SUCCEEDED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libgit2* to *1.4.3* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *libgit2* to *1.4.3* has Succeeded.
Next steps:
- apply the patch: git am
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164514
·
|
|
[AUH] at-spi2-core: upgrading to 2.44.0 FAILED
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *at-spi2-core* to *2.44.0* has Failed (devtool error).
Detailed error
Hello,
this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper
that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *at-spi2-core* to *2.44.0* has Failed (devtool error).
Detailed error
|
By
Auto Upgrade Helper
·
#164513
·
|