|
[PATCH] mpg123: upgrade 1.29.2 -> 1.29.3
Changelog:
====================
libmpg123: Catch more NULL pointer arguments in LFS wrappers
(most prominently: mpg123_feedseek(), bug 328).
mpg123:
-Fix regression that did _not_ enable --remote-err
Changelog:
====================
libmpg123: Catch more NULL pointer arguments in LFS wrappers
(most prominently: mpg123_feedseek(), bug 328).
mpg123:
-Fix regression that did _not_ enable --remote-err
|
By
wangmy
·
#159630
·
|
|
[PATCH] libical: upgrade 3.0.11 -> 3.0.12
Change log :
===========
Fix a libicalval crash in cleanVObject
METHOD:DECLINECOUNTER must have DTEND or DURATION
Handle if DTEND and DURATION are both missing
Improved FindICU (copied from official
Change log :
===========
Fix a libicalval crash in cleanVObject
METHOD:DECLINECOUNTER must have DTEND or DURATION
Handle if DTEND and DURATION are both missing
Improved FindICU (copied from official
|
By
wangmy
·
#159629
·
|
|
[PATCH] libcap: upgrade 2.61 -> 2.62
Remove set of BUILD_GPERF since it is now reserved.
Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu <wangmy@...>
---
meta/recipes-support/libcap/{libcap_2.61.bb => libcap_2.62.bb} | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1
Remove set of BUILD_GPERF since it is now reserved.
Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu <wangmy@...>
---
meta/recipes-support/libcap/{libcap_2.61.bb => libcap_2.62.bb} | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1
|
By
wangmy
·
#159628
·
|
|
[PATCH] python3-cython: upgrade 0.29.24 -> 0.29.25
Changelog:
================
Bugs fixed
----------
* Several incompatibilities with CPython 3.11 were resolved.
(Github issues #4411, #4414, #4415, #4416, #4420, #4428, #4473, #4479, #4480)
* Some C
Changelog:
================
Bugs fixed
----------
* Several incompatibilities with CPython 3.11 were resolved.
(Github issues #4411, #4414, #4415, #4416, #4420, #4428, #4473, #4479, #4480)
* Some C
|
By
wangmy
·
#159627
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] recipetool: Separate licenses with & operator
I mean that by reading the patch and the commit message it is not clear what problem is being fixed. It needs to be explained by showing what happens when there is no patch, and what happens when
I mean that by reading the patch and the commit message it is not clear what problem is being fixed. It needs to be explained by showing what happens when there is no patch, and what happens when
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#159626
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell 16/18] cmake: FindGTest: Add target for gmock library
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.16/module/FindGTest.html#result-variables
Thank you for providing more details.
The gmock target can be backported to dunfell in an alternative way, by
leaving out
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.16/module/FindGTest.html#result-variables
Thank you for providing more details.
The gmock target can be backported to dunfell in an alternative way, by
leaving out
|
By
Eero Aaltonen
·
#159625
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] recipetool: Separate licenses with & operator
Am 13.12.2021 um 14:00 schrieb Stefan Herbrechtsmeier via lists.openembedded.org:
Sorry I mean:
-LICENSE = "MIT ISC Unknown"
+LICENSE = "ISC & MIT & Unknown"
Am 13.12.2021 um 14:00 schrieb Stefan Herbrechtsmeier via lists.openembedded.org:
Sorry I mean:
-LICENSE = "MIT ISC Unknown"
+LICENSE = "ISC & MIT & Unknown"
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#159624
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] recipetool: Separate licenses with & operator
Am 13.12.2021 um 13:57 schrieb Alexander Kanavin:
Do you mean something like:
-LICENSE = "MIT ISC Unknown"
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & ISC & MIT & Unknown"
Am 13.12.2021 um 13:57 schrieb Alexander Kanavin:
Do you mean something like:
-LICENSE = "MIT ISC Unknown"
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & ISC & MIT & Unknown"
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#159623
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] recipetool: Separate licenses with & operator
I think this is better explained with an example. What did not work before, and what works with this change?
Alex
I think this is better explained with an example. What did not work before, and what works with this change?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#159622
·
|
|
[RFC PATCH 3/3] selftest: recipetool: Add test for handle_license_vars function
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/recipetool.py |
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/recipetool.py |
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#159621
·
|
|
[RFC PATCH 2/3] selftest: recipetool: Add test for split_pkg_licenses function
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/recipetool.py |
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/recipetool.py |
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#159620
·
|
|
[RFC PATCH 1/3] recipetool: Separate licenses with & operator
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
Separate licenses with & operator since it should be satisfied most use
cases and it is a reasonable assumption that all the
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@...>
Separate licenses with & operator since it should be satisfied most use
cases and it is a reasonable assumption that all the
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#159619
·
|
|
Re: The state of DKMS in the Yocto community
Yeah; I agree. In our case, we have several dozen drivers split across many product teams and largely distributing internally-controlled source. At this stage, it isn't feasible for us to build them
Yeah; I agree. In our case, we have several dozen drivers split across many product teams and largely distributing internally-controlled source. At this stage, it isn't feasible for us to build them
|
By
Alex Stewart
·
#159618
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] epiphany: Add packageconfig for libsoup2
Looks good to me, thanks :)
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <foss+yocto@...>
Cheers,
Quentin
Looks good to me, thanks :)
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <foss+yocto@...>
Cheers,
Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#159617
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 4/4] mesa: make ligles3-dev RDEPENDS on libgles2-dev
Khronos documentation[1] says that include/GLES2/gl2ext.h can be used
for OpenGL ES 3 specification as well as for OpenGL ES 2.
There can be applications including GLES2/gl2ext.h instead
Khronos documentation[1] says that include/GLES2/gl2ext.h can be used
for OpenGL ES 3 specification as well as for OpenGL ES 2.
There can be applications including GLES2/gl2ext.h instead
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#159616
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 3/4] kmscube: add build dependency on virtual/libgles3
texturator requires GLES 3 headers and libs so let's explicit this
dependency. This was not detected until now because mesa, the default
provider, actually provides both Open GLES 2 and 3
texturator requires GLES 3 headers and libs so let's explicit this
dependency. This was not detected until now because mesa, the default
provider, actually provides both Open GLES 2 and 3
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#159615
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 2/4] mesa: PROVIDES virtual/libgles3
It's assumed that not all OpenGL ES implementation are compliant with
the 3.x specification. Therefore an additional virtual providers is
created to explicit compatibility with OpenGL ES 3
It's assumed that not all OpenGL ES implementation are compliant with
the 3.x specification. Therefore an additional virtual providers is
created to explicit compatibility with OpenGL ES 3
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#159614
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 1/4] kmscube: fix build on OpenGL ES 3 dependencies not providing GLES3/gl3ext.h
According to Khronos documentation[1], gl2ext.h can be used for OpenGL
ES 3. Some vendor implementation of OpenGL ES 3, such as
Rockchip's libmali[2], do not have a gl3ext.h but only a gl2ext.h
According to Khronos documentation[1], gl2ext.h can be used for OpenGL
ES 3. Some vendor implementation of OpenGL ES 3, such as
Rockchip's libmali[2], do not have a gl3ext.h but only a gl2ext.h
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#159613
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] libtool: don't prefix the installed binary
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I think there still are some regressions to look into e.g. when
building with clang
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/619251/
This is because
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I think there still are some regressions to look into e.g. when
building with clang
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/619251/
This is because
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#159612
·
|
|
[PATCH v2] bootchart2: remove wait_boot logic
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
When boot with "init=/sbin/bootchartd" as below:
# runqemu qemux86 bootparams="init=/sbin/bootchartd"
There are two bootchartd process after boot [1].
#
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
When boot with "init=/sbin/bootchartd" as below:
# runqemu qemux86 bootparams="init=/sbin/bootchartd"
There are two bootchartd process after boot [1].
#
|
By
Yu, Mingli
·
#159611
·
|