|
Re: Correct way to set DRIDRIVERS and GALLIUMDRIVERS from mesa bbappend
I would like to work our how we can improve this situation, I'm just struggling
to see what we should do :/
Cheers,
Richard
I would like to work our how we can improve this situation, I'm just struggling
to see what we should do :/
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#159095
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] python: python3-idna: fix non-existent Unicode license
I think the Unicode should be clear, as the tool (in)directly uses downloads from unicode, but kindly ignores the licensing part of that operation.
Looking into the history of that lib I found
I think the Unicode should be clear, as the tool (in)directly uses downloads from unicode, but kindly ignores the licensing part of that operation.
Looking into the history of that lib I found
|
By
Konrad Weihmann <kweihmann@...>
·
#159094
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] python: python3-idna: fix non-existent Unicode license
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:
I looked at
https://github.com/kjd/idna/blob/master/LICENSE.md
https://pypi.org/project/idna/
and they seem to indicate that it is BSD-3-Clause so where
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:
I looked at
https://github.com/kjd/idna/blob/master/LICENSE.md
https://pypi.org/project/idna/
and they seem to indicate that it is BSD-3-Clause so where
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#159093
·
|
|
Re: Correct way to set DRIDRIVERS and GALLIUMDRIVERS from mesa bbappend
Hi Alex,
It's not a case of simply deleting the so files we don't need since the
mesa build system stuffs everything into a small number of files and then
hard links them together. For example, the
Hi Alex,
It's not a case of simply deleting the so files we don't need since the
mesa build system stuffs everything into a small number of files and then
hard links them together. For example, the
|
By
Mike Crowe
·
#159092
·
|
|
[dunfell 00/25] Pull request (cover letter only)
After some discussion with Richard on #yocto irc we've decided to drop the patch
status updates from this series.
The following changes since commit 44b1970c40e9d73f6e63fb10cdc55837a26f5921:
After some discussion with Richard on #yocto irc we've decided to drop the patch
status updates from this series.
The following changes since commit 44b1970c40e9d73f6e63fb10cdc55837a26f5921:
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#159091
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] bitbake.conf: Pad rpath and remove build ID in native binaries
Unfortunatley this breaks building python3-native. Although it compiles,
during the build the python build scripts tries to import the created
modules, and if this fails (which it does) it renames the
Unfortunatley this breaks building python3-native. Although it compiles,
during the build the python build scripts tries to import the created
modules, and if this fails (which it does) it renames the
|
By
Jacob Kroon
·
#159090
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] python: python3-idna: fix non-existent Unicode license
Cc'ing licensing@... to hopefully get knowledgeable
people on the topic?
Thanks,
Quentin
Cc'ing licensing@... to hopefully get knowledgeable
people on the topic?
Thanks,
Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#159089
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] linux-yocto-dev: Make -dev kernel work for a fixed revision
Thanks Bruce.
Kevin
By
Kevin Hao
·
#159088
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] linux-yocto-dev: Make -dev kernel work for a fixed revision
ok. Let's solve this with an explicit KBRANCH with your pinned SRCREVs
for now, and I'll update -dev to use versioned branches for the current
5.16 cycle and all new versions that follow.
Bruce
--
ok. Let's solve this with an explicit KBRANCH with your pinned SRCREVs
for now, and I'll update -dev to use versioned branches for the current
5.16 cycle and all new versions that follow.
Bruce
--
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#159087
·
|
|
[dunfell][PATCH] go-helloworld: test at runtime
From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
This adds a smoke check for whether the Go toolchain actually
produces working executables across a range of architectures.
(From OE-Core rev:
From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
This adds a smoke check for whether the Go toolchain actually
produces working executables across a range of architectures.
(From OE-Core rev:
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#159086
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] bitbake.conf: Pad rpath and remove build ID in native binaries
Another crazy thought is our sstate really is already path independent,
regardless of the binary content. You could therefore make the hash function
replace the path with a fixed string. The downside
Another crazy thought is our sstate really is already path independent,
regardless of the binary content. You could therefore make the hash function
replace the path with a fixed string. The downside
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#159085
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] bitbake.conf: Pad rpath and remove build ID in native binaries
Right, I'll give it a try.
I know the build path will change if I upgrade to a new version of gcc,
but then the output is most definitely gonna change as well.
I was thinking if it was possible to
Right, I'll give it a try.
I know the build path will change if I upgrade to a new version of gcc,
but then the output is most definitely gonna change as well.
I was thinking if it was possible to
|
By
Jacob Kroon
·
#159084
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] bitbake.conf: Pad rpath and remove build ID in native binaries
I'm wondering if:
-Wl,-rpath,/not/exist/our-native-libdir-marker
-Wl,-rpath,/not/exist/our-native-base-libdir-marker
would work.
We originally started here with gcc-cross so lets consider that and
I'm wondering if:
-Wl,-rpath,/not/exist/our-native-libdir-marker
-Wl,-rpath,/not/exist/our-native-base-libdir-marker
would work.
We originally started here with gcc-cross so lets consider that and
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#159083
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] bitbake.conf: Pad rpath and remove build ID in native binaries
Hmm not sure I follow. This patch adds a new dummy rpath entry,
"/rpath-padding-xxx...", then we remove it in chrpath. I don't know what
other value we would like to put there. If I understand you
Hmm not sure I follow. This patch adds a new dummy rpath entry,
"/rpath-padding-xxx...", then we remove it in chrpath. I don't know what
other value we would like to put there. If I understand you
|
By
Jacob Kroon
·
#159082
·
|
|
[meta][dunfell][PATCH 3/3] libsolv: update tag for missing CVEs
From: Ranjitsinh Rathod <ranjitsinh.rathod@...>
It seems like CVE-2021-33928, CVE-2021-33929, CVE-2021-33930 and
CVE-2021-33938 are pointing to same patch as CVE-2021-3200
So add CVE tag inside
From: Ranjitsinh Rathod <ranjitsinh.rathod@...>
It seems like CVE-2021-33928, CVE-2021-33929, CVE-2021-33930 and
CVE-2021-33938 are pointing to same patch as CVE-2021-3200
So add CVE tag inside
|
By
Ranjitsinh Rathod
·
#159081
·
|
|
[meta][dunfell][PATCH 2/3] ncurses: Fix for CVE-2021-39537
From: Ranjitsinh Rathod <ranjitsinh.rathod@...>
Add patch to fix CVE-2021-39537
Link:
From: Ranjitsinh Rathod <ranjitsinh.rathod@...>
Add patch to fix CVE-2021-39537
Link:
|
By
Ranjitsinh Rathod
·
#159080
·
|
|
[meta][dunfell][PATCH 1/3] gmp: Fix for CVE-2021-43618
From: Ranjitsinh Rathod <ranjitsinh.rathod@...>
Add patch to fix CVE-2021-43618
Link: https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp-6.2/rev/561a9c25298e
Signed-off-by: Ranjitsinh Rathod
From: Ranjitsinh Rathod <ranjitsinh.rathod@...>
Add patch to fix CVE-2021-43618
Link: https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp-6.2/rev/561a9c25298e
Signed-off-by: Ranjitsinh Rathod
|
By
Ranjitsinh Rathod
·
#159079
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] native/cross: make ar wrapper support to read options from file
I've several tries, and append -D works well
This is my original trying, if above failed in some cases, we have to
give up to support determinism for @
//Hongxu
I've several tries, and append -D works well
This is my original trying, if above failed in some cases, we have to
give up to support determinism for @
//Hongxu
|
By
hongxu
·
#159078
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] native/cross: make ar wrapper support to read options from file
I am a little surprised this works, since "-D" would be placed after any
archive/member parameters. But if does, ok.
Otherwise maybe we should just give up if there is a '@' and fallback to
not
I am a little surprised this works, since "-D" would be placed after any
archive/member parameters. But if does, ok.
Otherwise maybe we should just give up if there is a '@' and fallback to
not
|
By
Jacob Kroon
·
#159077
·
|
|
[PATCH] native/cross: make ar wrapper support to read options from file
If ar input params starts with @, it means to read options from file
$ ar -h
...
@<file> - read options from <file>
...
It failed to call ar wrapper to read options from file:
$
If ar input params starts with @, it means to read options from file
$ ar -h
...
@<file> - read options from <file>
...
It failed to call ar wrapper to read options from file:
$
|
By
hongxu
·
#159076
·
|