|
Empty packages and bogus dependencies - what to do?
6 messages
Hi All, There has been some interest in some older bugs about empty packages and bogus dependencies and what we should do about them. Yohan and Fawzi were kind enough to post some patches to prompt so
Hi All, There has been some interest in some older bugs about empty packages and bogus dependencies and what we should do about them. Yohan and Fawzi were kind enough to post some patches to prompt so
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
create-spdx support in dunfell
3 messages
Hi All, I'm sending this to oe-arch as it seems the best place to mention/discuss it. After reading an email about encouraging best practises when supporting older software releases, it got me thinkin
Hi All, I'm sending this to oe-arch as it seems the best place to mention/discuss it. After reading an email about encouraging best practises when supporting older software releases, it got me thinkin
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
WORKDIR fetcher interaction issue
11 messages
I was asked about a WORKDIR/fetcher interaction problem and the bugs it results in. I've tried to write down my thoughts. The unpack task writes it's output to WORKDIR as base.bbclass says: fetcher =
I was asked about a WORKDIR/fetcher interaction problem and the bugs it results in. I've tried to write down my thoughts. The unpack task writes it's output to WORKDIR as base.bbclass says: fetcher =
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
[OE-core] Y2038 proposal
2 messages
Your email prompted me to check my own software (Dropbear) and it showed a few y2038 issues to fix. Those bugs wouldn't be noticed from a quick test - it "only" prevented auth and idle timeouts from o
Your email prompted me to check my own software (Dropbear) and it showed a few y2038 issues to fix. Those bugs wouldn't be noticed from a quick test - it "only" prevented auth and idle timeouts from o
|
By
Matt Johnston
·
|
|
[yocto] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Y2038 proposal
6 messages
Some time ago I filed https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6803 as Debian has a nice sanity check where it warns if non-LFS glibc functions are used. I imagine the same logic could be use
Some time ago I filed https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6803 as Debian has a nice sanity check where it warns if non-LFS glibc functions are used. I imagine the same logic could be use
|
By
Ross Burton
·
|
|
OEDvM and OpenEmbedded Workshop
Hello fellow OpenEmbeddeders! Less than 24 hours until we kick off the OpenEmbedded Developers virtual Meeting 2022.11! For more details, please see https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/OEDvM_2022.11 You
Hello fellow OpenEmbeddeders! Less than 24 hours until we kick off the OpenEmbedded Developers virtual Meeting 2022.11! For more details, please see https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/OEDvM_2022.11 You
|
By
Josef Holzmayr
·
|
|
Y2038 proposal
5 messages
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 16:45, Stephen Jolley <sjolley.yp.pm@...> wrote: > We’d welcome a proposal/series on how to move forward with the Y2038 work for 32 bit platforms. I have the following proposal:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 16:45, Stephen Jolley <sjolley.yp.pm@...> wrote: > We’d welcome a proposal/series on how to move forward with the Y2038 work for 32 bit platforms. I have the following proposal:
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
|
|
[yocto] Y2038 proposal
6 messages
Hi Alexander, Please find a few comments: 1. There is already provided meta-y2038 [1] to test if 32 bit systems correctly support Y2038 problem. It uses qemu machines from OE/Yocto 2. There are ptest
Hi Alexander, Please find a few comments: 1. There is already provided meta-y2038 [1] to test if 32 bit systems correctly support Y2038 problem. It uses qemu machines from OE/Yocto 2. There are ptest
|
By
?ukasz Majewski
·
|
|
[OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Y2038 proposal
2 messages
Hi Richard, Y2038 ptests maybe? Here is the list of integrated tests to ptests: https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038-tests Could you be more specific here? Would you like to disable some syscalls? Could
Hi Richard, Y2038 ptests maybe? Here is the list of integrated tests to ptests: https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038-tests Could you be more specific here? Would you like to disable some syscalls? Could
|
By
?ukasz Majewski
·
|
|
[OE-core] [yocto] Y2038 proposal
4 messages
lists.openembedded.org wrote: What is the potential issue with builtools? To be clear, we don't run ptests on 32 bit targets, only on qemux86-64 and qemuarm64 where we have KVM available. We do run im
lists.openembedded.org wrote: What is the potential issue with builtools? To be clear, we don't run ptests on 32 bit targets, only on qemux86-64 and qemuarm64 where we have KVM available. We do run im
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
[yocto] Y2038 proposal
I ran a-full with "-D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" last week, it didn't go too well gcc-sanitizer and pulseaudio being the main offenders but buildtools needs to be investigated. The main issu
I ran a-full with "-D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" last week, it didn't go too well gcc-sanitizer and pulseaudio being the main offenders but buildtools needs to be investigated. The main issu
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
|
|
Bitbake changes for the next release?
Hi, I've a few things I've been pondering for a while and given the summit and OEDVM this week, I thought I'd sent out this email and some RFC patches. Export variable flag (and unexport/network) ----
Hi, I've a few things I've been pondering for a while and given the summit and OEDVM this week, I thought I'd sent out this email and some RFC patches. Export variable flag (and unexport/network) ----
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
OEDvM 2022.11
Users, contributors, members! [1] It is about time again to gather - in virtual form - for some hours of knowledge exchange, discussion, and designing the future of OpenEmbedded. The OpenEmbedded Deve
Users, contributors, members! [1] It is about time again to gather - in virtual form - for some hours of knowledge exchange, discussion, and designing the future of OpenEmbedded. The OpenEmbedded Deve
|
By
Josef Holzmayr
·
|
|
Relocatable binaries - better kernel support?
5 messages
I thought I'd quickly write down some notes on the relocatable binary "problem" we have. We have a need to be able to run our binaries with a different dynamic loader in a few cases which basically co
I thought I'd quickly write down some notes on the relocatable binary "problem" we have. We have a need to be able to run our binaries with a different dynamic loader in a few cases which basically co
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
Template handling in OE-Core
8 messages
I'm starting a new thread/discussion on this with a new perspective. I did a little research myself on how these files are being used. My conclusion is that templateconf.cfg isn't really used by much
I'm starting a new thread/discussion on this with a new perspective. I did a little research myself on how these files are being used. My conclusion is that templateconf.cfg isn't really used by much
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
[yocto-announce] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Milestone 3 for Yocto Project 4.1 (yocto-4.1_M3) Now Available
3 messages
Hi all, I thought the agreement was to stop promoting meta-gplv2? Still I find it listed here - it somehow implies that this is still officially support, which everyone agreed it isn't Can this be rem
Hi all, I thought the agreement was to stop promoting meta-gplv2? Still I find it listed here - it somehow implies that this is still officially support, which everyone agreed it isn't Can this be rem
|
By
Konrad Weihmann
·
|
|
Adding more information to the SBOM
9 messages
Dear all, (cross-posting to oe-core and *-architecture) In the last months, we have worked in Oniro on using the create-spdx class for both IP compliance and security. During this work, Alberto Pianon
Dear all, (cross-posting to oe-core and *-architecture) In the last months, we have worked in Oniro on using the create-spdx class for both IP compliance and security. During this work, Alberto Pianon
|
By
Marta Rybczynska
·
|
|
[OE-core] Adding more information to the SBOM
2 messages
Hi Joshua, nice to meet you! I'm new to this list, and I've always approached Yocto just from the "IP compliance side", so I may miss important pieces of information. That is why Marta encouraged me a
Hi Joshua, nice to meet you! I'm new to this list, and I've always approached Yocto just from the "IP compliance side", so I may miss important pieces of information. That is why Marta encouraged me a
|
By
Alberto Pianon
·
|
|
toolchain selection in core
I was asked about getting official support for the TOOLCHAIN variable in core. This is obviously late in the release cycle and after a bit of thought, the answer is no. I wanted to document why since
I was asked about getting official support for the TOOLCHAIN variable in core. This is obviously late in the release cycle and after a bit of thought, the answer is no. I wanted to document why since
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|
|
[Automated-testing] RFC Linter in meta-openembedded
21 messages
Sharing a copy of this to openembedded-architecture. Cheers, Richard
Sharing a copy of this to openembedded-architecture. Cheers, Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
|