Date
1 - 13 of 13
Linux 5.10 LTS "mixin" layer for Dunfell
Denys Dmytriyenko
All,
Recently several Yocto Project members have expressed interest in being able to upgrade the Linux kernel in Dunfell LTS release from 5.4 to 5.10. Both of those Linux kernel versions are designated "longterm"[1], but at the time Dunfell was released in April 2020, 5.10 was not out yet. Recommended way to add new features or upgrade components in Yocto LTS releases is with the so called "mixin" layers[2]. After discussing some of the details of such layer among the Yocto Project TSC and other interested developers, as well as testing the concept for few weeks, I'd like to make this open to a wider consumption in hopes it would be useful to others. This Linux kernel "mixin" layer is currently hosted on GitHub under my name[3], but can be moved to a more public space, like Yocto Project git server, if it gets traction and is found useful to others. Please feel free to try it and provide feedback. Thanks! [1] https://kernel.org/ [2] https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS#LTS_.E2.80.9CMixin.E2.80.9D_repositories [3] https://github.com/denix0/meta-lts-kernel-mixin -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 |
|
Mark Hatle
Did someone already backport the change to Dunfell to fix the module.lds for out
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
of tree kernel builds? Master commit 596b0474d3d? For gatesgarth, we ended up porting a copy of this into our distribution branch, as it was rejected for a backport. Also there was a necessary change for kernel-devsrc as well, I believe the oe-core commit was: cb940d8af359fa370254bd4c2b36ba26708bb54b See: https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-petalinux/tree/rel-v2021.1/oe-core/meta classes/kernel.bbclass and recipes-kernel/linux this was the best way we could find to override these files for gatesgarth. --Mark On 7/19/21 12:55 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
All, |
|
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:55:42 -0400
"Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@...> wrote: All,Hi Denys, This looks like a good initiative. A couple of initial comments: layer.conf contains `PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "5.10%"`. It'd be better to leave that out and in the readme say that users need to add this in their distro or local conf. That would bring the layer in line with best practices and what's needed for Yocto Project Compatible status as adding simply a layer to a build should not result in changes to the images you build. The layer needs a COPYING or LICENSE file. It'd be good to explicitly say how contributions to the layer can be made - should this be by GitHub pull request or via a mailing list? Thanks, -- Paul Barker https://pbarker.dev/ |
|
Steve Sakoman
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:34 PM Mark Hatle
<mark.hatle@...> wrote: Yes, see https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=dunfell&id=5981a05525442f1a0db1c4e710b319dbf1fbba8b For gatesgarth, we ended up porting a copy of this into our distribution branch,I missed that one, but it seems safe enough so I'll add it to my next review series. Steve See: |
|
Denys Dmytriyenko
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:38:05AM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:55:42 -0400Paul, Thanks for the review! This looks like a good initiative. A couple of initial comments:Right, good point. I put it there for testing and totally forgot about it. The layer needs a COPYING or LICENSE file.Sure, will add a standard MIT one. It'd be good to explicitly say how contributions to the layer can beYeah, it was missing because GitHub is a temporary location for this layer. Most probably contribution model will be via a mailing list - will have to update it after the move. -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 |
|
Denys Dmytriyenko
All,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The layer has been updated and moved to git.yoctoproject.org under a central mixin repo called "meta-lts-mixins", branch "dunfell/kernel": http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-lts-mixins/ The naming is in accordance with the LTS mixin layer guidelines: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS#LTS_.E2.80.9CMixin.E2.80.9D_repositories Other mixin layers are also welcome! On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 01:55:42PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
All, --
Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 |
|
Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 23:51 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
All,Should the layer be called kernel-5.10 since there potentially may be other versions? Cheers, Richard |
|
Denys Dmytriyenko
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 23:51 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:Either that, or it can hold multiple versions...All,Should the layer be called kernel-5.10 since there potentially may be other -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 |
|
Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 12:38 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:I think that defeats the idea of specific purpose layers?On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 23:51 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:Either that, or it can hold multiple versions...All,Should the layer be called kernel-5.10 since there potentially may be other Cheers, Richard |
|
Denys Dmytriyenko
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:40:32PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 12:38 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:Not necessarily. Providing latest LTS kernels for Dunfell also seems veryOn Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:I think that defeats the idea of specific purpose layers?On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 23:51 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:Either that, or it can hold multiple versions...All,Should the layer be called kernel-5.10 since there potentially may be other specific. For every extra year of official support for Dunfell, this can offer a new LTS kernel version, that can be selected by PREFERRED_VERSION. Creating a new branch for each kernel version seems wasteful. But I can do that as well, if needed. -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 |
|
Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 18:54, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> wrote: Not necessarily. Providing latest LTS kernels for Dunfell also seems very Hello Denys, if I would like to add a 'dunfell/gizmo' branch to that repository, how would it work if a given build needs both the kernel and the gizmo? Is the repo supposed to be cloned twice into two separate locations on disk? The page https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS#LTS_.E2.80.9CMixin.E2.80.9D_repositories doesn't make it clear either. Thanks, Alex |
|
Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:30:55PM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 18:54, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> wrote:Yes, I believe that was the intended usage:Not necessarily. Providing latest LTS kernels for Dunfell also seems veryHello Denys, $ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins -b dunfell/kernel meta-lts-kernel-mixin $ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins -b dunfell/gizmo meta-lts-gizmo-mixin When TSC discussed the process for Mixin layers, we wanted them to be slim single-purpose layers and using branches instead of whole git repos seemed reasonable. Especially since we were not envisioning too many of them. But if it proves to be a problem in the future, we can certainly revisit it then. -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 |
|
Alexander Kanavin
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 22:40, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...> wrote:
Thanks, there might be that gizmo added then in the not too distant future :) Alex |
|