|
should oe-core issue a warning when it reaches EOL?
Em seg., 1 de ago. de 2022 às 19:41, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: What about security flaws that aren't fixed and could lead to a compromised device and people not kno
Em seg., 1 de ago. de 2022 às 19:41, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: What about security flaws that aren't fixed and could lead to a compromised device and people not kno
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1611
·
|
|
should oe-core issue a warning when it reaches EOL?
Em seg., 1 de ago. de 2022 às 14:30, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...> escreveu: I don't see problems with this and whoever wishes to support it, can easily override it.
Em seg., 1 de ago. de 2022 às 14:30, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...> escreveu: I don't see problems with this and whoever wishes to support it, can easily override it.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1609
·
|
|
should oe-core issue a warning when it reaches EOL?
Em seg., 25 de jul. de 2022 às 18:09, Konrad Weihmann <kweihmann@...> escreveu: If the user can disable this, using a variable inside local.conf, it is acceptable and helps people be aware the
Em seg., 25 de jul. de 2022 às 18:09, Konrad Weihmann <kweihmann@...> escreveu: If the user can disable this, using a variable inside local.conf, it is acceptable and helps people be aware the
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1597
·
|
|
should oe-core issue a warning when it reaches EOL?
Em seg., 25 de jul. de 2022 às 15:13, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...> escreveu: I like the idea so users are aware of it.
Em seg., 25 de jul. de 2022 às 15:13, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...> escreveu: I like the idea so users are aware of it.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1594
·
|
|
Overrides conversion plan
Em qua., 28 de jul. de 2021 às 12:43, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: I believe your plan is good and given the new layers will work down to dunfell I see no big problems
Em qua., 28 de jul. de 2021 às 12:43, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: I believe your plan is good and given the new layers will work down to dunfell I see no big problems
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1292
·
|
|
Should we change variable override formatting?
Hello Richard, Em qui., 15 de jul. de 2021 às 10:56, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: If we don't do as a flag day we cannot drop old code from bitbake, so my vote goes to
Hello Richard, Em qui., 15 de jul. de 2021 às 10:56, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: If we don't do as a flag day we cannot drop old code from bitbake, so my vote goes to
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1262
·
|
|
New assignment operator?
Em qua., 16 de jun. de 2021 às 02:08, Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@...> escreveu: I really like the === proposal.
Em qua., 16 de jun. de 2021 às 02:08, Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@...> escreveu: I really like the === proposal.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1248
·
|
|
New assignment operator?
Hello Richard, Em ter., 15 de jun. de 2021 às 07:29, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: Having it resetting it might fix this use case but what if the _collie use case is a
Hello Richard, Em ter., 15 de jun. de 2021 às 07:29, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: Having it resetting it might fix this use case but what if the _collie use case is a
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1232
·
|
|
promoting Rust to first class citizen in oe-core
Em qui., 10 de set. de 2020 às 16:51, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...> escreveu: I support this for sure. I've been using Rust with Yocto Project for a while now and it does fit well to be i
Em qui., 10 de set. de 2020 às 16:51, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...> escreveu: I support this for sure. I've been using Rust with Yocto Project for a while now and it does fit well to be i
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1170
·
|
|
Stable release testing - notes from the autobuilder perspective
Hello all, Em seg., 7 de set. de 2020 às 13:14, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: I second this and at least at O.S. Systems we've been using Docker containers to keep main
Hello all, Em seg., 7 de set. de 2020 às 13:14, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> escreveu: I second this and at least at O.S. Systems we've been using Docker containers to keep main
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #1163
·
|
|
Syntax for multiple overrides?
<richard.purdie@...> wrote: We made a https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/classes/machine-overrides-extender.bbclass which allow for one override to expland to a se
<richard.purdie@...> wrote: We made a https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/classes/machine-overrides-extender.bbclass which allow for one override to expland to a se
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #855
·
|
|
Stable releases and version upgrades
Sure; every change comes with a risk however if someone does not want any change they can lock their layer hashes. However, doing manual patches also comes with they own set of risk and limits. I thin
Sure; every change comes with a risk however if someone does not want any change they can lock their layer hashes. However, doing manual patches also comes with they own set of risk and limits. I thin
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #827
·
|
|
Stable releases and version upgrades
Agreed. Few project's I'd like to see more regular updates (following the stable branch) on the stable branches are: go mesa cmake libarchive systemd gstreamer1.0 Those has good and big comunities and
Agreed. Few project's I'd like to see more regular updates (following the stable branch) on the stable branches are: go mesa cmake libarchive systemd gstreamer1.0 Those has good and big comunities and
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #823
·
|
|
Trusted/secure/etc layers
he also recipes. A DISTRO_FEATURES or a MACHINE_FEATURES? It seems more related to the machine.
he also recipes. A DISTRO_FEATURES or a MACHINE_FEATURES? It seems more related to the machine.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #751
·
|
|
gnutls 3.6 upgrade
I'd go for 2 and see how bad is it. So we can plan accordingly and see if it can be doable or not for 2.5 release.
I'd go for 2 and see how bad is it. So we can plan accordingly and see if it can be doable or not for 2.5 release.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #682
·
|
|
Layer compatibility markup proposal
One possible way to mitigate the issue is raising a big warning but failing completely. This makes clear that it may fail but does not enforce a manual action to continue.
One possible way to mitigate the issue is raising a big warning but failing completely. This makes clear that it may fail but does not enforce a manual action to continue.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #633
·
|
|
LSB is dead; when shall we drop it?
The main question here is if we are going to keep OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1 in parallel inside OE-Core or not. For Pyro I think we should stay on 1.0 or have 1.1 as an opt-in option, but for 2.4 I would say
The main question here is if we are going to keep OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1 in parallel inside OE-Core or not. For Pyro I think we should stay on 1.0 or have 1.1 as an opt-in option, but for 2.4 I would say
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #516
·
|
|
Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools
<alexander.kanavin@...> wrote: In fact not; as you generate the recipes for the dependencies, it goes recursively and is always good. Well we initially thought this would suffice but consi
<alexander.kanavin@...> wrote: In fact not; as you generate the recipes for the dependencies, it goes recursively and is always good. Well we initially thought this would suffice but consi
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #485
·
|
|
Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools
Hello Alexander, <alexander.kanavin@...> wrote: When integrating the CHICKEN Scheme support onto the Yocto Project we dealt it using their installation tool but making the package of indiv
Hello Alexander, <alexander.kanavin@...> wrote: When integrating the CHICKEN Scheme support onto the Yocto Project we dealt it using their installation tool but making the package of indiv
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #483
·
|
|
patchwork (etc) support for BSP layers (OEDAM 2017)
The requirement of membership for patchwork is non-sense. It is hosted under openembedded.org domain and as such it is a community resource. YP Git, CI and whatever is inside YP resources I am fine wi
The requirement of membership for patchwork is non-sense. It is hosted under openembedded.org domain and as such it is a community resource. YP Git, CI and whatever is inside YP resources I am fine wi
|
By
Otavio Salvador
· #469
·
|