|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Isn't this all already handled by:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=abb8895d5b42a5dc171360a261a2652acd14ee7e
?
Isn't this all already handled by:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=abb8895d5b42a5dc171360a261a2652acd14ee7e
?
|
By
Andre McCurdy
·
#1340
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I understand that, however, the reality is that organizations have IT
teams which are
catering to a wider set of security needs and have been
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I understand that, however, the reality is that organizations have IT
teams which are
catering to a wider set of security needs and have been
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#1339
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Some servers out there (e.g. our own git.yoctoproject.org) have slightly
different git and https urls so this isn't as simple as you'd think.
The security offered by https isn't as great as it first
Some servers out there (e.g. our own git.yoctoproject.org) have slightly
different git and https urls so this isn't as simple as you'd think.
The security offered by https isn't as great as it first
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1338
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Can we change bitbake fetcher to default to https instead git
anonymous protocol as fallback? this will be good security measure
too.
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
Can we change bitbake fetcher to default to https instead git
anonymous protocol as fallback? this will be good security measure
too.
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#1337
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
wrote:
I've sent out a couple of patches for bitbake, one which does the remapping and
a second which adds the warning. Testing would be appreciated before I merge
them (I need to focus on master
wrote:
I've sent out a couple of patches for bitbake, one which does the remapping and
a second which adds the warning. Testing would be appreciated before I merge
them (I need to focus on master
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1336
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
I think we put a warning on master and forwards but not older bitbakes.
Cheers,
Richard
I think we put a warning on master and forwards but not older bitbakes.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1335
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
I totally agree with that. I still think we should also warn out so we don't have to maintain this magic quirk forever.
Andrei
I totally agree with that. I still think we should also warn out so we don't have to maintain this magic quirk forever.
Andrei
|
By
Andrei Gherzan
·
#1334
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
The brownouts are already happening, got 20+ failed jenkins jobs over night, because they failed to fetch various metadata layers over git:// from github. And hopefully my understanding of the
The brownouts are already happening, got 20+ failed jenkins jobs over night, because they failed to fetch various metadata layers over git:// from github. And hopefully my understanding of the
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#1333
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Thanks for reporting this, it helps to know this is happening as we'll probably
start seeing odd error reports for the brownouts.
I've updated the conversion script I mentioned earlier in this thread
Thanks for reporting this, it helps to know this is happening as we'll probably
start seeing odd error reports for the brownouts.
I've updated the conversion script I mentioned earlier in this thread
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1332
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
The difference is that only few upstream repos are renaming master to main while removing the master branch completely and the change of the default branch to main affects only newly created repos on
The difference is that only few upstream repos are renaming master to main while removing the master branch completely and the change of the default branch to main affects only newly created repos on
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#1331
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
The issue I think is the size of it. When you consider just the main
branch for oe-core, this isn't an issue, but with all the release
branches people are still on, with all the various layers some
The issue I think is the size of it. When you consider just the main
branch for oe-core, this isn't an issue, but with all the release
branches people are still on, with all the various layers some
|
By
Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin
·
#1330
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Hi,
OnTue, 2 Nov 2021, at 10:49, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
And by GitLab I meanGitHub.
Andrei
Hi,
OnTue, 2 Nov 2021, at 10:49, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
And by GitLab I meanGitHub.
Andrei
|
By
Andrei Gherzan
·
#1329
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Hi,
I don't think this is a bigger issue because I don't see this warranting a default change. It is just an upstream protocol support change and we will update the respective recipes. If we don't,
Hi,
I don't think this is a bigger issue because I don't see this warranting a default change. It is just an upstream protocol support change and we will update the respective recipes. If we don't,
|
By
Andrei Gherzan
·
#1328
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
There is even bigger issue with git repos from github.com now:
https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/#no-more-unauthenticated-git
bitbake git fetcher uses git://
There is even bigger issue with git repos from github.com now:
https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/#no-more-unauthenticated-git
bitbake git fetcher uses git://
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#1327
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Yes, exact timing to be determined but hopefully sooner than later (before April
release).
Cheers,
Richard
Yes, exact timing to be determined but hopefully sooner than later (before April
release).
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1326
·
|
|
Re: Default branch names in git urls
Although the situation is a bit unfortunate I like the proposal and the script will likely make the transition less painful.
Are you planning to turn the warning into an error at some point?
Although the situation is a bit unfortunate I like the proposal and the script will likely make the transition less painful.
Are you planning to turn the warning into an error at some point?
|
By
Konrad Weihmann <kweihmann@...>
·
#1325
·
|
|
Default branch names in git urls
We've had concerns about the default behaviours of tools like git and how
they'll handle the default branch names going forward. There are also concerns
about what providers like github may do, and
We've had concerns about the default behaviours of tools like git and how
they'll handle the default branch names going forward. There are also concerns
about what providers like github may do, and
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1324
·
|
|
OpenEmbedded Happy Hour October 27 9pm/2100 UTC
All,
Our next OpenEmbedded Happy Hour is on October 27 for Asia/Pacific timezones @
2100/9pm UTC (5pm ET / 2pm
All,
Our next OpenEmbedded Happy Hour is on October 27 for Asia/Pacific timezones @
2100/9pm UTC (5pm ET / 2pm
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#1323
·
|
|
Re: Linux 5.10 LTS "mixin" layer for Dunfell
Thanks, there might be that gizmo added then in the not too distant future :)
Alex
Thanks, there might be that gizmo added then in the not too distant future :)
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#1322
·
|
|
Re: Linux 5.10 LTS "mixin" layer for Dunfell
Yes, I believe that was the intended usage:
$ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins -b dunfell/kernel meta-lts-kernel-mixin
$ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins -b
Yes, I believe that was the intended usage:
$ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins -b dunfell/kernel meta-lts-kernel-mixin
$ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins -b
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#1321
·
|