On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 09:17 -0600, Sean Hudson wrote:
The suggested approach of adding a specific dependency for these situations makes sense to me. I am confused by the name though. What do folks think about using 'POST_INST_DEPS' instead of 'PACKAGE_WRITE_DEPS'?
I keep going around in circles on this. The naming would then match one use of it rather than where the dependency is added. It makes less sense when you think this could apply to preinsts and its *not* about target requirements, only native ones.
