On 5. Sept 2022, at 13:40, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> wrote:

Hi Marius,

On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 13:25 +0200, Marius Kriegerowski wrote:

Picking up on this thread now, almost half a year later :) Sorry for
the late reply but turned out (a little surprising) that I’m going to
have a daughter soon which shifted my priorities a little…

Understandable, congratulations! :)

So, I looked into patchtest a few months ago and found a couple of
issues where I considered a rewrite. So, I gave it a shot last
weekend but instead of python I used rust. You can find the demo
here: https://github.com/HerrMuellerluedenscheid/patchtest-rs

This doesn't seem like a good direction to me. I have nothing against
rust, I've spent the past couple of months trying to sort out rust
support in OE-Core. The problem is most of our tools (bitbake,
autobuilder, buildbot and so on) are python based and most of our
developers know python. Most don't know rust (myself included). Making
a core tool hard to understand by our core developer base doesn't seem
like a wise move.

The functionality is currently limited to loading a patch from the
commandline, checking that the summary is in place and applying the
patch to a repository given by a url. The repo will be cloned on the
fly.

The next step would be an smtp client that checks for incoming
messages every N seconds and runs patchtest against patches and sends
back a short report of what worked and what didn’t.

I just wanted to check that revitalising patchtest is still an open
issue and would like to ask for quick feedback.

We definitely do want to revitialise it. One change is that we do now
have publicinbox available for OE-Core and bitbake:

https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/
https://lore.kernel.org/bitbake-devel/

so rather than fighting SMTP, we should be able to read patches from
there via the git representation.

Cheers,

Richard