Re: inclusive language
On Wed 2020-07-15 @ 03:05:38 AM, Rich Persaud wrote:
On Jul 15, 2020, at 01:31, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> wrote:I post them on the yocto mailing list in plain text with formatting, or youWe discussed this briefly at the most recent YP Technical Team/EngineeringIs there a YP mailing list where the minutes of the YP meeting were posted?
can see them all collected here in google docs:
I haven't done today's posting yet. They usually have a title something along
the lines of:
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for <date>
This email is my attempt to get everyone together on this topic since,1. As a project we need to decide whether or not to undertake this work. NotAlso discussed at the June 24th, 2020 OpenEmbedded Happy Hour
for now, email is one of this project's main channels for communication.
Yesterday's call was the first time I had heard anyone bring it up (except
for Richard's email about some upstream projects no longer having a master
where manyI'm merely pointing out the conversation went straight into getting a feeling
for what was involved.
Fair enough.6. Terminology. The Linux kernel project has put out some recommendations:From the Linux coding style diff, "avoid introducing new usage", refers to new names, rather than changing existing systems with consequential impact on distributed supply chains for live systems.
Where did you read anything about looking for funding?