[oe] [PATCH] imagemagick: convert to BBCLASSEXTEND and new staging
clarson at kergoth.com
Wed Mar 24 16:09:48 UTC 2010
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Thomas Zimmermann <ml at vdm-design.de>wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 24 März 2010 01:48:58 schrieb Chris Larson:
> > This should not be necessary. native.bbclass automatically sets deps on
> > the -native versions of what's in your DEPENDS. Or was there a specific
> > reason behind adding libtool-native and removing tiff?
> No there was no such a reason, i just copied it from imagemagick-
> native_0.6.3.5-10 recipe.
> The question is, do we convert 6.3.5-10 to BBCLASSEXTEND too, or do we
> that recipe, or is there a bug about mixed BBCLASSEXTEND and -native
> that -native recipes are preferred?
It seems to be a bug, yes. Or questionable behavior, rather. It's known.
Best to convert both, unless you're confident no one would be affected by a
removal of the old -native.
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
More information about the Openembedded-devel