[oe] [PATCH] imagemagick: convert to BBCLASSEXTEND and new staging

Chris Larson clarson at kergoth.com
Wed Mar 24 16:09:48 UTC 2010

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Thomas Zimmermann <ml at vdm-design.de>wrote:

> Am Mittwoch 24 März 2010 01:48:58 schrieb Chris Larson:
> > This should not be necessary.  native.bbclass automatically sets deps on
> >  the -native versions of what's in your DEPENDS.  Or was there a specific
> >  reason behind adding libtool-native and removing tiff?
> >
> No there was no such a reason, i just copied it from imagemagick-
> native_0.6.3.5-10 recipe.
> The question is, do we convert 6.3.5-10 to BBCLASSEXTEND too, or do we
> remove
> that recipe, or is there a bug about mixed BBCLASSEXTEND and -native
> recipes,
> that -native recipes are preferred?

It seems to be a bug, yes.  Or questionable behavior, rather.  It's known.
 Best to convert both, unless you're confident no one would be affected by a
removal of the old -native.
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics

More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list