[oe] samba-essential upgrade or remove?
k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Mon Mar 15 08:53:27 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 15-03-10 04:46, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2010 13:51:35 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>> On Monday 08 March 2010 13:42:07 Dr. Michael Lauer wrote:
>>> While I'm not using it atm., I recall that samba-essential was the only
>>> recipe that worked relatively painless when Matthias Hentges create it
>>> back then.
>> Then please fix it. You will do a great service to our users. The following
>> CVEs are not addressed:
>> CVE-2009-2813, CVE-2009-2948, CVE-2009-2906, CVE-2009-1888,
>> CVE-2008-4314, CVE-2008-1105, CVE-2007-6015, CVS-2007-4572, CVE-2007-5398,
>> CVE-2007-2444, CVE-2007-2446, CVE-2007-2447, CVE-2007-0452, CVE-2007-0453,
>> CVE-2007-0454, CAN-2006-1059..
> any update? Is anyone volunteering to update samba-essential or shall we
> remove it from the tree?
I think samba-essential reason of being can be done in regular samba
recipes by putting some better thought in PACKAGES and FILES. So: delete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Openembedded-devel