[OE-core] [PATCH v1] postinst-intercepts: check tool presence in intercept hooks

Sinan Kaya Okaya at kernel.org
Mon Jul 1 01:38:59 UTC 2019

On 6/30/2019 5:54 PM, richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>> /update_pixbuf_cache: cannot create
>> /home//riscv-yocto/build/tmp-glibc/work/qemuriscv64-oe-linux/core-
>> image-full-cmdline/1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-
>> 2.0/2.10.0/loaders/../loaders.cache:
>> Directory nonexistent"
> Knowing which branches (sumo vs. thud) and which layers does help put a
> different perspective on this issue and helps us help you!

Sorry, I thought I mentioned this before.
Issue showed up in thud. It was not there on sumo.

> Is this a difference in dash shell vs bash shell (e.g. for /bin/sh) on
> these machines? (if I had to guess that is where I'd start)

Dash vs. bash didn't make a difference. I changed build machine to have
/bin/sh point to /bin/bash rather than /bin/dash.

The commit on github also says "it may help" with the postinst.
Apparently, the issue has been solved mysteriously for them.

One thing that issue on github mentions is that these issues were being
ignored in sumo but are marked as real failures starting from thud.

More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list